מכל מלמדײ השכלתי (duchifat) wrote,
מכל מלמדײ השכלתי
duchifat

Подготовил письмо главреду US News & World Report

Подготовил письмо главреду US News & World Report. Пока не послал. Есть ли замечания?

Mr. Brian Kelly
Editor & Chief Content Officer
1050 Thomas Jefferson Street NW, 4th Floor
Washington, DC 20007
bkelly@usnews.com
lyons@usnews.com

Dear Mr. Kelly:

I am a faculty member in the University of XXXXXX. I would like to thank you for the ratings of Best US universities and colleges published in US News & World Report. I was particularly pleased to find that my department’s rank has grown this year and that it was steadily growing during the past five years.

However, I would like to share my concern about one particular matter related to the ranking methodology as described in the article "Methodology: 2015 Best Engineering Schools Rankings. Find out how U.S. News ranks graduate engineering programs" by Sam Flanigan and Robert Morse (http://www.usnews.com/education/best-graduate-schools/articles/2014/03/10/methodology-2015-best-engineering-schools-rankings).

In estimating the research activity of faculty, the amount of research expenditures was the only parameter taken into consideration. However, scientific research is about making scientific discoveries and not about making money. The importance of the discoveries, the depth of the ideas and the lasting impact on the scientific field (which is usually measured by citation and journal impact) matter for estimating the quality of research. I personally think that taking into consideration the quality of publication and scientific results as well as their impact on their scientific field is very important. Many international ranking methodologies take scientific quality into account.

Presenting the amount of money spent as the only parameter characterizing the quality of research sends a wrong message to university administrators, such as Deans and Department Chairs. Since most funding agencies are funded by taxpayers, your approach also encourages wasting taxpayer’s money for projects, which are not scientifically sound but money-consuming.

UPDATE: Окей, раз никто ничего не говорит, то отправил.
Subscribe

  • питерские наблюдения

    1) В районе Пяти углов, наверно, штук 50 разных ресторанов. Среди них - израильский Бе-кицер (мне там ожидаемо не понравилось). Еще есть бар "Цыгане…

  • Pierce’s Abduction of Science: Is Anti-Intellectualism of American Universities Rooted in Pragmatism

    Пишу злобную анти-американскую статью про измерение науки деньгами. Выложу-ка сюда кусок черновика, может, у кого какие замечания? Я, в частности,…

  • (no subject)

    На мой взгляд (это я все про трактат Аркадьева думаю), бесконечность возникает не в языке (с его потенциальной возможностью бесконечной рекурсии) а…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 2 comments